雅思大作文结尾段作为文章的收尾部分,其重要性不言而喻,一个优秀的结尾段不仅能够总结全文观点、强化核心论点,还能给阅卷留下深刻印象,为文章增色不少,许多考生在结尾段写作中存在诸多问题,如内容重复、观点模糊、结构混乱等,这些问题直接影响作文的整体得分,本文将深入探讨雅思大作文结尾段的写作策略、常见误区及实用技巧,帮助考生掌握结尾段的写作要点,提升作文质量。

结尾段的核心功能与写作原则
结尾段在雅思大作文中扮演着“总结者”和“升华者”的双重角色,其核心功能主要包括三个方面:一是总结全文主要观点,重申作者立场;二是概括分论点,强调论证逻辑;三是提出建议、预测未来或引发思考,使文章立意更高远,基于这些功能,写作结尾段需遵循三大原则:简洁性(控制在2-4句话,避免冗长)、概括性(不引入新观点,只总结已有内容)、呼应性(与开头段和主体段观点保持一致)。
以“是否应该禁止塑料袋使用”为例,若开头段提出“应禁止塑料袋使用”的立场,主体段从“环境污染”“资源浪费”“替代方案可行性”三个角度展开论证,结尾段则需简洁概括这三个分论点,并重申禁止塑料袋的必要性,避免突然提出“可降解塑料袋是更好选择”等新观点。
结尾段的结构框架与写作步骤
一个结构清晰的结尾段通常包含“总结观点+重申立场+升华主题”三个层次,具体写作步骤可分为以下四步:
第一步:明确主题句
用1句话概括全文核心观点,可直接呼应开头段的立场句。“In conclusion, banning plastic bags is a necessary measure to address environmental degradation and promote sustainable development.”
第二步:概括分论点
用1-2句话提炼主体段的分论点,避免简单罗列,而是用逻辑词串联。“Firstly, plastic bags pose a severe threat to ecosystems by contaminating soil and oceans; secondly, their production consumes non-renewable resources, exacerbating resource scarcity; finally, the availability of affordable alternatives makes the ban feasible.”
第三步:提出建议或展望
(可选)根据主题提出解决方案、政策建议或未来趋势预测。“Therefore, governments should enforce strict regulations while educating the public to adopt eco-friendly habits, ensuring a greener future for generations to come.”
第四步:强化立场
(可选)用一句有力的话重申立场,增强说服力。“Only through collective action can we mitigate the harm caused by plastic pollution.”
结尾段常见误区及规避方法
考生在写作结尾段时,常因对功能理解偏差而陷入以下误区,需特别注意:
| 常见误区 | 问题分析 | 规避方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 引入新观点或新论据 | 打破文章逻辑连贯性,让阅卷者认为论证不充分 | 严格遵循“总结已有内容”原则,所有观点需在主体段中已提及 |
| 简单重复开头段或主体段句子 | 空洞,缺乏深度思考 | 用同义替换或句式变换重新概括观点,例如将“harmful”替换为“detrimental” |
| 过于笼统或空泛 | 如“To sum up, we should protect the environment”,未结合具体主题 | 紧扣题目关键词,例如将“protect the environment”具体化为“reduce plastic consumption” |
| 忽视立场一致性 | 结尾段观点与开头段矛盾,例如开头支持“禁止塑料袋”,结尾却认为“应限制使用而非禁止” | 写作前检查开头段与主体段立场,确保结尾段完全一致 |
结尾段句式与词汇提升技巧
为使结尾段更具学术性和说服力,考生需掌握多样化的句式和精准的词汇表达:
高频开篇句式
- "In conclusion, ... / To sum up, ... / Overall, ..."(简洁通用)
- "From the perspectives of [A], [B], and [C], it is evident that..."(强调多角度论证)
- "The aforementioned arguments demonstrate that..."(正式书面化表达)
逻辑衔接词
- 表示递进:"furthermore", "moreover", "what's more"
- 表示因果:"therefore", "thus", "as a result"
- 表示转折:"however", "nevertheless"(用于让步后重申立场)
高分词汇替换
- "important" → "crucial", "vital", "imperative"
- "solve" → "address", "tackle", "mitigate"
- "good/bad" → "beneficial/detrimental", "advantageous/harmful"
普通结尾:“In conclusion, we should ban plastic bags because they are bad for the environment.”
优化后:“From the perspectives of environmental conservation and resource sustainability, it is imperative to prohibit plastic bags, as their detrimental impact on ecosystems far outweighs their temporary convenience.”
实战演练:题目与结尾段对照分析** Some people believe that university education should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
开头段立场: "I firmly agree that university education should be accessible to all without financial barriers, as it promotes social equity and fosters national development."
主体段分论点:
- 经济角度:免费教育减轻低收入家庭负担,促进教育公平。
- 社会角度:高学历人口增加推动创新和经济增长。
- 个人角度:教育提升就业竞争力,减少贫困循环。
优秀结尾段示范:
"In conclusion, providing tuition-free university education is a crucial investment in social equity and economic progress. By eliminating financial barriers, it enables individuals from all backgrounds to access higher education, thereby fostering a more skilled workforce and reducing poverty cycles. Ultimately, governments should prioritize funding free education to build a more inclusive and prosperous society for future generations."
解析:
- 首句重申立场(“crucial investment”呼应“firmly agree”);
- 中间句概括分论点(经济、社会、个人角度);
- 末句提出建议并升华主题(“inclusive and prosperous society”)。
相关问答FAQs
Q1:结尾段是否必须包含“建议”部分?如果不写会影响分数吗?
A1:并非必须包含建议部分,结尾段的核心功能是总结观点,是否添加建议取决于题目类型和论证需求,在“同意与否”题型中,若主体段已充分论证立场,结尾段可直接总结;而在“问题解决”题型中,建议部分则能增强实用性,阅卷者更关注逻辑连贯性和观点明确性,而非固定结构,因此不写建议不会直接影响分数,但若能合理添加,可使文章更完整。
Q2:如何在结尾段避免与主体段内容重复?
A2:可通过“概括性重述”和“同义替换”避免重复,具体方法包括:
- 提炼核心论点而非细节:例如主体段详细描述“塑料袋导致海洋生物死亡”,结尾段概括为“plastic bags threaten marine life”;
- 变换句式结构:将主动句改为被动句,或合并分句;
- 使用抽象化表达:例如将“政府应加强监管”概括为“policy intervention is essential”。 关键是确保总结内容与主体段一致,但表达方式更精炼、更宏观。
